REBUTTALS AND CENSORSHIP

I've emailed professors and asked them to write rebuttals to the videos here. They don't take up the challenge. I've tried to place ads in newspapers asking professors to write rebuttals. The newspapers decline to run the ad. (Berkeley and Harvard.)

This UC Berkeley café was right next door to the entrance of the Doe Library where I went to do research for my first video "One Third of the Holocaust." It's ironic that the UC Berkeley student newspaper wouldn't let me place an ad once my video was done. (Look at the name of the café in the photo.)

Then there's Youtube. They have a "comments" area underneath their videos, and there were many rebuttal comments to my videos, but those were removed by Youtube when they deleted the video "One Third of the Holocaust" and "Nazi Shrunken Heads."

This website will publish any rebuttal written by a full or associate professor in a history department of a recognized university, right here, unedited, at the top of this page.

Currently there are rebuttals written to episodes of One Third of the Holocaust. They are written by people who are knowledgable but not tenured professors in history departments, and the writers do engage in ad hominem put-downs. Nevertheless they can be found here. Read them and make your own decision.

At Youtube, though the episodes themselves are no longer there, there are some rebuttal videos to specific episodes of One Third of the Holocaust made by a user named "Sobe104839." They are a vestige of when my videos used to be on youtube. In other words the rebuttal videos are still there though my videos have been deleted. You can find them by searching "holocaust denial movie" at Youtube.

Those are the only rebuttals I know of.

Below is a sort of scrapbook of censorship: Good faith efforts to solicit rebuttals, and blocked attempts to promote the video One Third Of The Holocaust. If you scroll down below you will see a deleted classified ad where the UC Berkeley newspaper, The Daily Californian, wouldn't even let me ask the question "do myths ever propel the destruction of indigenous peoples?" I took this up by emailing all professors of the UC Berkeley journalism department telling them that I was told I couldn't place the classified ad. Only one professor replied, telling me that it was the newspaper's right to refuse the ad.

 

11/2/7: At the Minnesota Daily, I ran a classified ad for six days with the text on the right, starting on October 1, 2007. In addition I personally emailed every full professor in the Physics and Astronomy Department, and in the Chemistry Department inviting them to submit a rebuttal to the technical episodes. No one took up the challenge. I didn't email assistant or associate professors since I was aware that taking a favorable position could effect their tenure possibilities.

Call For Papers

Holocaust Denial Movie Debunked by you. OneThirdoftheHolocaust.com is a 4-hour free web movie. The thesis is that Treblinka, Sobibor, and Belzec were not death camps. Your refutation will be published on website, giving viewers access to other side. Essay must pertain to one of the 30 chapters. Suggested chapter for areas of expertise: Chemistry: chs. 2,4,10; Physics: chs. 4,10,11,20,23; History: chs. 1,5,9,17; Biology: chs. 2,4,7,23. Engineering: chs. 6,10,15,18. Toxicology: chs. 2,4; Law: chs. 1,5,8,22. Send refutation in body of email to (email withheld) Open to Everyone.
The UC Berkeley student newspaper, The Daily Californian, wouldn't let me place a classified ad which merely asked for rebuttals to my movie. But they let the CIA place ads during the same period at a time when they were torturing people at Guantanamo. In contrast, I go into libraries and take photos of books, yet I'm the bad guy.

 

Below was my first attempt to run an ad. It was to run 40 times and I paid cash, but it got pulled after one day and they refunded my money. Above the garage sales and bake sales we see the one day it ran:

 

Regarding the above ad: a number of the Berkeley newspaper staff were Arab, and they offered no support just like everybody else. Similarly I sent a Palestinian professor in the History department a DVD of the video "One Third of The Holocaust" and then called him on the phone. In the 10 second conversation, he told me "I'm not interested."

Below: In a screenshot of a video later removed by Youtube staff, I'm quoting Senator Chris Dodd's dad, while just above the video, a Youtube banner encourages people to learn about the candidates.

 

Below: In a rare pairing of "Reader's Digest" and "Inappropriate Nature" we see Youtube has removed one of my video episodes. I looked at Youtube's Terms of Use and Community Guidelines and I wasn't breaking any rules. I was just discussing an article in an old copy of Reader's Digest.

 

Below: 22 chapters of my video got deleted in one day on July 2, 2007, and I got a separate automated email message for each one. The other chapters had been deleted long before. 31 videos posted. 31 removed. I went through the Youtube appeal process to protest their being deleted, and as a result, I succeeded in getting Youtube staff to put back up the first episode of "One Third of the Holocaust" but whatever internal workings at google/youtube happened, 8 months later, out of the blue, the first episode of One Third Of the Holocaust got deleted for a second time. Currently I have 3 videos on youtube. One is a video that discusses youtube censoring me. The deletions hurt my ratings, viewings, and search engine status so much that I have virtually no presence on youtube. While I used to get over 100 views a day there, and had a video with 30,000 views, now I'm lucky if I get 25 views a month for the 3 videos that I have up. Meanwhile the Israeli Defense Forces channel operates without restrictions from youtube and made the top 10 "most viewed videos" status repeatedly during their Gaza offensive.