August 7, 2009

Frederic Jameson is an interesting person. Before I was a holocaust denier, I read parts of his book Postmodernism, Or The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism, and it definitely helped me come to holocaust denial though it took years. In the first chapter entitled "Culture" he discusses a novel called Ragtime by E.L Doctorow. To understand what Jameson was writing, I read Ragtime. (I'd remembered my dad having this book as a kid.) Basically Ragtime was a Jewish fantasy. A Jewish writer using real historical characters blended into a story that made Jewish characters look super cool, and other non-Jewish characters look super lame. Jameson never said anything "Jewish" about the book, and what he said was quite a mouthful:

"What such a description would want to register is the paradox that a seemingly realistic novel like Ragtime is in reality a nonrepresentational work that combines fantasy signifiers from a variety of ideologemes in a kind of hologram." (p. 23)


In a sense there's no difference between reading Ragtime and the book Surviving Treblinka by Samuel Willenberg. In Willenberg's book, after he escapes Treblinka, he joins the Resistance; we then read about the attractive woman who gives him a gun, and who also "makes out" with him. Or there's the passage where Willenberg and a few others rob a Nazi factory where his mom happens to be a slave laborer, and in the middle of the robbery, he has a conversation with his mom and gives her his address. In the middle of the robbery! Willenberg is a supposed eyewitness whose credibility has never been questioned by a single history professor, and whose daughter Orit Willenberg Giladi designed the Israeli Embassy in Berlin, with it's 6 façade blocks representing 6 million.

The Holocaust Kingdom by Alexander Donat would be another book fitting what Jameson said. After Donat wrote his not-believable camp memoir, Donat put himself in the role of historical researcher and wrote one of the most important books on Treblinka, with Samuel Willenberg's help.

Then there are books featuring new enemies in new places, of the 1970's, like The Haj by Leon Uris. With it's bad portrayal of Arabs.

These books all fit into the Jameson interpretation of Ragtime, and the concept isn't exactly the same, but nevertheless makes me think of movies by Sacha Baron Cohen like Borat and Bruno.

In Postmodernism, I also liked the chapter called "Nostalgia for the Present" which dealt with a book by Philip K. Dick called Time Out of Joint. Jameson wrote,

"the sense people have of themselves and their own moment of history may ultimately have nothing whatsoever to do with it's reality." (p. 281)

I went to one of Frederic Jameson's lectures once, in the late 1990's and he said the strangest thing. It seemed so odd then and yet doesn't seem odd now. He said "I think Islam is the biggest threat to capitalism." In the context of the lecture, what he meant was 'Islam is the biggest impediment to capitalist expansion.' You can't imagine how nutty Jameson's comment sounded in the late 1990's. I thought to myself, "well, o.k. he's gone off the deep end with that statement, but hey, other things he says make sense."

------------------------------------------------------------------

6/1/9

I've been meaning to put these images up. I saved them three weeks ago. I've seen many along the same lines since. It's pro-war manipulation. It's keeping Israel and the holocaust fresh in everyone's mind. It's a lot of things. And there's no record that millions of yahoo users see this kind of thing when they check their accounts. With the NYT it's put on microfilm or in a database. But with this, there's no record:

Above is from 5-11-9

Above is from 5-12-9

 

5/1/9

My new "flyers" link on the main page: I hope some people do it.

The Thomas Blatt site is updated. He's going to make world headlines as the chief witness for the Ivan Demjanjuk Sobibor trial in 2009 or 2010, and at least there's a web page out there which points out why he's a fraud.

I updated the post below with an image of what my email box looks like and the spin on the news that comes with it. Scroll down and see the image. Notice the "spin" on Ahmadinejad's speech and the Netanyahu piece of news.

Bradley Smith. What a great guy. A guy who has helped me so much I can't even tell you. If I had come on the revisionist scene and there was no Bradley Smith I don't know what I would have done.

3/17/9

Jews really do control the media. Where I see it the most (in my limited interaction with media) is when I check my Yahoo email account. You can't get to your email without seeing a list of the top stories. There's usually 5 top stories, a short sentence denoting each one. I'd say a holocaust story comes up about once a week. There were particularly more after the Israeli invasion of Gaza. It was as if it was psychological "damage control" against a tide of public opinion against Israel. Then there's the frequent Yahoo top story about the Palestinian/Israeli issue, and the false impression these stories give is that US officials and negotiators are doing all they can to improve this tough and complicated situation. That's not true at all. US foreign policy kowtows to Israel and the Jewish lobby in the USA. In reality Israeli policy toward the Palestinians is blatantly unfair and that never comes out in the media. Basically it's mind control via controlling media and thus controlling news. Controlling minds through controlling news. Whether it's Jews writing the stories (frequently is), owning the outlet, or deciding what stories are picked, or non-Jews being pressured by Jewish interests is irrelevant. The result is the same.

And I think it's about Trust. It's just what the 1947 book Sykewar by Daniel Lerner said: you get people's trust with a media publication by including real stories, honest stories, important stories, and through that you gain the readers' trust. Then at that point you can then throw in the fake story, or a spin on an event which promotes your interests. In today's US media that would be the holocaust myth and information about the Palestinians.

"Trust" is probably the biggest reason Americans believe in the holocaust. They just can't believe that media and university professors would lie about such a thing. It's more complicated than that, but that's how the average person sees it.

Marshall McLuhan coined the phrase "the medium is the message" but he later wrote a book with the phrase slightly changed "The Medium Is The Massage." In other words media is massaging into you. Yesterday the top story was about Israel/Palestinian negotiations, and how the US was involved as an intermediary. And it was such bunk. It was so loaded with a Zionist innuendo but tepid enough for the average white collar Joe not to notice that and instead unconsciously "trust" the writer. The story was a massage for Jewish interests. Today the last "top story" is about a guy in Belarus that built his own holocaust monument in his back yard.

You're just checking your email while the media is massaging into you. Giving you a worldview that the power structure wants you to have.

It's amazing how transgressive it is to just say what is clearly the case: Jews control the media and use it for their objectives. They're the ones misleading and as a result helping Americans to support a terrible US foreign policy in the Mideast, but I'm the bad guy for saying it. It's "power" making "truth" appear bad. Power creates it's own pseudo-truth, and it's amazing how intellectual, lofty, respectable, and distinguished that pseudo-truth is. Welcome to Columbia University. LOL.

To get an idea of the skew away from what objective reporting would look like, start noticing how often you see a top story about the American Indians, in contrast to how often you see an item about the holocaust. That will tell you everything you need to know.

Update 5/1/9: I took a photo of what I'm talking about above. It's from around a week and a half ago on 4/20. It's the type of thing I often see when I check my yahoo email, and there's no record of it, no documentation that millions of people also see this when they go to their email. It's not like this everyday, but it is quite frequent to have the news look something like this. It's less about news and more about control. There's a headline about Israel and a headline about the holocaust at least once a week, meanwhile you won't hear about similar sized countries for an entire year, you might not see a thing about the American indians for 3 months:

 

 

12/11/8

Militarism does suck. This supposed protection that somehow flips to your own persecution on so many levels. Suddenly you're being persecuted by the pompous, loud, disturbing posturing that's 'for your protection.'

And it was all there in high school: I was in the marching band, and we'd play John Philips Sousa marching band songs, and it felt dorky. That's because it was. Marching band songs: a genre of music meant to hype-up a population for war. Militarism mixing with culture is always dorky. The "stoners" on cancer island (the place where high schoolers were allowed to smoke cigarettes) wouldn't be caught dead wearing a dumb-ass blue uniform playing that lame marching music. Had we practiced-marched past their island they would have laughed their asses off. They themselves putting on some Led Zeppelin later in the day when they got home. And in retrospect they were right. The Immigrant Song: Come to the Land of Ice and Snow. Yes, this mystical land, or do I want to go with 50 students who got into band because they like music but somehow got railroaded to musically simulate a march to the battlefield with our instruments.

It should have been called 'Sage Island.'

12/2/8

I just put a donation link. I put One Third of the Holocaust on the web over two years ago, and I always figured it would be cool to not ask for money: I thought that people just would voluntarily give. But *beings that that never happened* I decided to now put a donation link.

I recently finished "Phil Donahue Analysis" Basically it's the show with my observations. What becomes evident is that the witnesses were all lying on the show. Everybody there (except Bradley Smith) believes a phone caller who is an obvious fraud. David Cole makes excellent points. Bradley Smith's courageousness sticks out. It's odd to see a show that discusses something that is illegal to publicly discuss in much of Europe. The music (when they take the commercial break) is that cheesy relaxing Kenny G style, and what a contrast to hear that and at the same time know that someone would go to jail if this was a present day German or French production.

9-2-8
I'm just going to write informally about things regarding my recent video on Buchenwald.

In making this video, I got the impression that there was a stuggle between 3 forces in the 20th century: Racialism (Nazism), Communism, and Capitalism. And capitalism won. It kind of explains the world we live in today. The invisible hand of capitalism grows labor wherever it's easiest and most cost-efficient, then imports the labor when grown (young adults) to low-birthrate countries with thriving economies, often to be exploited for their labor with no real recourse since they are illegal, much to the benefit of their employers. That scenario says everything about capitalism defeating it's rivals: racialism and communism. I'm not saying it's bad or good. It's not a judgement call on my part. It is what it is. It's the world we live in.

A personification of capitalism would be CD Jackson, Henry Luce, and others. I've rolled my eyes in the past when right-wingers mention the "Council of Foreign Relations" and "The Bilderbergers." Talk of these groups struck me as nutty conspiracy theories. But Kai Bird's book The Chairman tells you what they really were: A group of prominent business people trying to influence American foreign policy. CD Jackson, John McCloy, Henry Luce, all members and leaders in various capacities within these organizations, picked because their identities most personify capitalism. Capitalism has a mind of it's own. It should be called "the invisible brain" rather than "the invisible hand."

Basically the holocaust myth was used by Capitalism to help defeat Racialism.


"Gays in the Military" that phrase sums up a lot.
It's militarism that's bad. Not gays. The idea of "fighting for tolerance" is a masquerade of capitalism and even Zionism. If the big lesson of World War II is spun as "Tolerance" then "gays in the military" is perfect. If the big lesson of World War II is that "Militarism sucks" then "gays in the military" doesn't work so well.

On Senator Joe McCarthy. The man associated with the 1950's "Red Scare."
The way the story was presented to me at university was that McCarthy made a big deal about communists in the USA which initiated a kind of national witch hunt consciousness, but ultimately it was just a big brouhaha over nothing. Then in the early mid-1990's I read a modern architecture book called "No Place Like Utopia" by Peter Blake and in chapter 7, he discusses his belief that Stalinists in the early 1940's really were trying to take control of institutions, even those as far from politics as the Harvard Graduate School of Design. I had never heard anyone say that before, and I wasn't even looking for that. I was reading that book because I was interested in modern architecture which was in vogue at the time. Anyway, after becoming a holocaust denier, and researching my Buchenwald video, I think there's a third take on McCarthy which no one has ever discussed: He might have been uncovering, or poised to uncover the holocaust myth. The notion seems absurd until you read passages in Kai Bird's book, The Chairman, like where General Lucius Clay is asking Eisenhower if there's a way he can get McCarthy to stop his prying. Clay was the post-war governor of West Germany. In my video, I point out that Eisenhower arranged for US senators to go to Buchenwald to show them atrocity evidence, but they're being conned: Eisenhower knows it's a psyche warfare operation. The senators don't. Yet the senate is a powerful part of American government which Eisenhower manipulated. So then here's Senator McCarthy poking around in the early 1950's.

I mentioned my McCarthy hunch to a friend and I couldn't believe what his response was: That McCarthy had gotten in the way of the execution of Waffen SS members for the Malmedy Massacre by stating that Waffen SS soldier confessions were obtained under torture. I didn't even know about that. What McCarthy did regarding Malmedy has some connections to holocaust revisionism.

Kai Bird's book tells us what brought McCarthy down. A hit piece on CBS television from Edward Murrow.

But Edward Murrow's radio address from Buchenwald is the most famous radio address associated with that camp, and after the war, Murrow became a vice president of CBS under William Paley. That it's Murrow who brought McCarthy down, makes me think that there's a "holocaust hoax" element to the McCarthy thing even more. Murrow was the subject of the 2005 movie "Good Night, and Good Luck." Where of course he's portrayed as an ethical righteous dude.

Ever heard of Kim Philby? He was the British Liason to the CIA in the 1950's. The top British secret service guy in Washington DC and it turned out he was a Soviet spy. Because of him, all kinds of covert operations were revealed to the Soviet Union. Then he defected and lived the rest of his life in the Soviet Union. I remember when I first read about him, I had complete contempt for him. But after reading parts of "The Very Best Men" and "The Chairman" I have a whole different take on Kim Philby. He was working with such pieces-of-work Americans who were doing the most unethical crap all over the world, that one can see Philby's perspective a little better. The American head of all these secret anti-communist projects in places like Iran, Bolivia, and Indonesia was Frank Wisner. Philby worked with Wisner. And when you know what a piece of work Wisner was, you can kind of understand Philby's position.

The whole CIA LSD thing. Yeah, Wisner signed off on that. The Very Best Men describes the CIA making a "blue movie" of General Suharto of Indonesia having a romantic interlude with a blonde stewardess. It was a Suharto look-alike, and a CIA operation. Directed Bing Crosby of "I'm Dreaming of a White Christmas" fame. No I didn't make that up. It's in the book, and Kim Philby was seeing crap like this happen. No wonder he went over.

One of the Buchenwald footage DVD's I used begins with a camera in 1945 pointed at a piece of paper, a signed statement, while a guy reads it under oath. He ends by mentioning that he's reading this in front of a prominent official, John Ford.

John Ford was the director of the Western movie "The Searchers" which a couple of snippets are in the movie. That's actually a coincidence. I put it in there because years ago I saw that it was included in the AFI top 100, and so I decided to watch it, and was gobsmacked by the portrayal of the indians in the film. What a lame-ass genre of film: The Western. Then a week before I'm done with my Buchenwald video I notice on my yahoo email news headings that John Ford was a secret member of the OSS, the wartime predecessor of the CIA. It wasn't a fact that was allowed to come out till 2008!

Here's the yahoo news article.

Excerpt:
"The records show that Ford left his successful Hollywood life as a movie director to become a secret agent in 1941, later rising to serve as Donovan's chief adviser."

Bill Donovan was the wartime head of the organization (OSS) that later became the CIA. An organization that must have been a major player in the hoax. 24,000 employees.

Psyche warfare and the OSS (later became CIA) tapped into Hollywood people skilled at portraying the indians as evil, and used them to portray the Germans as evil. John Ford is an example. He had made westerns in the 1930's.

That's why I put that part in the video of John Wayne picking up the little doll. What excellent emotional content! Complete with wrenching classical music. A parallel to holocaust stories!

The writer of The Searchers and his background is interesting too. Looked up his New York Times obituary but I won't get into that.


I saw Rosemary's Baby by Roman Polanski around 13 years ago, and because I was scared and traumatized by the end of it, I wished I'd only watched the first 1/3 or so, because I liked the slice-of-life element of New York City in the early 60's. Particularly that charming apartment complex where the film took place. So later I learn that apartment complex is the Dakota apartments in New York City. I was into modern architecture at the time, and I even saw these apartments in real life, when I came upon them while walking around New York City once. This apartment complex also happens to be where John Lennon lived in 1980 when he was killed. So needless to say it's a trip to learn that that's where CD Jackson lived.

The guy who held up the human pelvis ashtray, and thought of ways to get the American public interested in war with North Viet Nam as publisher of Life Magazine, might have been just down the hall when Polanski was filming Rosemary's Baby.

Or maybe not: Jackson died in 1964, and Rosemary's Baby came out in '68.


I mention "evolution" in my video via Kevin MacDonald's Group Evolutionary Strategy theory. And it must come off as odd: Most people think of evolution as man evolved from apes; or developing a third arm over millions of years. LOL but behavior-evolution happens much faster. 30 generations? A few hundred years? The Middle Ages explains a lot about today. All our ancestors were right there in the Middle Ages. And it's not like Jews are the only ones to talk about regarding evolution. How about the Germans. Going further back. Fighting the Romans for hundreds of years. Do they have an ethno-genetic militarism?

Evolutionary strategy: With Jews or Germans, it's not a good/bad call anymore than studying how animals in the jungle act is a good/bad call. It's just evolution. Did nature select for it and why.

The Billy Wilder propaganda movie has nutty stuff I never even mentioned. They show a dead man with a giant number tattooed on his stomache: The Germans only tattooed at Auschwitz, and Auschwitz slave laborers did arrive at Buchenwald. But the tattoo was always on their arm.

Another thing that didn't make it into the video is that an American bombing raid on Buchenwald in August 1944 killed hundreds of inmates. Killed the wife and daughter of Herman Pister, the commander. Most likely killed Ernst Thallman. He was the head of the German communists and would have been the leader of East Germany after the war had he not been killed. So you could see why the Americans would want to cover that up.

On David Hackett's introduction to the Buchenwald Report: I'm grateful Hackett brought that document into accessibility via translating it and having it published, but his introduction shows how gullible he is. He states that the Nazis were going to try to bomb the camp and kill all the inmates. The Nazis never did that to any camp. It would have just left some dead and a lot wounded. It's ridiculous to believe that there was a plan to do that. But then Hackett's introduction also refers to Wilder's propaganda movie as "a documentary." I emailed Hackett a little bit, and spoke to him on the phone once, but when I revealed I was a denier, that was the last I ever heard from him.

Notice the footage of the Germans on the forced tour: there are very few military age men. They are either already dead, or resisting the Soviets in the East. I believe that it was the very same day that Eisenhower toured Ohrdruf, that he also ordered American forces to stop, so that the Soviet Union could take over the rest of Germany including Berlin. (Roosevelt, by the way, also died on that day I believe) The Germans knew that Soviet forces conquering their land meant mass-rape of their women and so they fought to the end rather than accept that. The biggest rape in history and rather than any American sympathy at that moment in time, it becomes the time that the holocaust myth starts coming into the American papers and newsreels, so that the opposite of sympathy happened.

There's a couple military age men in the forced tour footage: like the guy with bandages all over his head looking at the table objects.

I didn't want to be a John F. Kennedy conspiracy theorist and am not sure if I am. In my video, I mention the "CD Jackson crowd" as possibly killing Kennedy. Number 1 in that crowd is Frank Wisner. When he wasn't commanding the USA's biggest covert operations entailing things like overthrowing the Shah of Iran, he was in and out of mental institutions. He killed himself a few years after Kennedy's assassination.

"The Very Best Men" and "The Chairman" both talk about how the CIA recruited Wall Street lawyers from Ivy League schools. How perfect for a struggle between capitalism and communism.

Even in my conversation with the 89 year old Albert G. Rosenberg, he told me that Ilse Koch would have inmates gather in one place and then ride up on a white horse to select people for tattoos. How ridiculous. Rosenberg is the man verbally addressing the German audience while CD Jackson holds up the objects at them. Rosenberg can't be seen in the footage though. But in former inmate Jorge Semprun's book Literature or Life, he describes the scene. I have photographed a couple of those pages. Scroll down to # 5 here.

Basically Karl Koch had an indoor horse riding arena built using communist slave labor inmates. Their recourse was lies. Making up rumours. I did a search on "arena" in the google books, on the Buchenwald Report and found the passage about the horse riding arena.

In my other video "Nazi Shrunken Heads" I mention a congressional hearing co-chaired by Emmanuel Cellar. I haven't researched it in the New York Times full search index, but apparently Cellar in the later 1940's was big on pushing lies about Ilse Koch and her lampshades, with his quotes making it into the New York Times.

Hey, be a holocaust denial video maker. A great career! It's thankless and pathetic. For one you get the lamest comments from people ever. No one offers money to help.

To be honest the most intelligent person to ever engage me in an interesting dialogue about my videos, who intelligently discussed the specifics of my video, was a Jewish man. A very cool Jewish man. He's not a denier, but he was intelligently discussing the specifics of my video. He turned me on to stuff I didn't know, and vice versa. A few others have discussed the videos intelligently but this guy was the best.

You'll never see a photo of it, because it's swept under the rug, it's suppressed, but for 40 years in communist East Germany they displayed a lampshade at Buchenwald that was allegedly a human skin lampshade. In 1989 they tested it and found it was made out of goat skin. It's still at Buchenwald. Under Harry Stein's curation I believe. It's in a cabinet. It's not on view. It's not the same lamp as in the footage.

And I've heard this, but haven't seen the transcript, that there was a Buchenwald guards' trial, and witnesses mentioned a human skin lampshade, but with a twist: the base of the lampshade was a human bone. I can't confirm this. I don't even know where the Buchenwald guards transcript could be found. But what an assertion: the lies just get more ridiculous.


There is an error in the Buchenwald video. The video states that the Nazis didn't know about the delousing properties of DDT, but the Americans did. That's untrue. The Swiss (probably Swiss Germans) discovered the insecticide capability, and shared that discovery with everyone. The Germans had licenses to produce it, but bombing of chemical plants and transportation facilities likely disrupted their ability to make it and get it to the camps.

The DDT/lice issue is an integral part of the holocaust story and so here are some documents on it:

Winter 2000 American Heritage Article on DDT.

If the link doesn't work it's archived here.

1944 Geigy Press Release. Geigy is the Swiss company that discovered the insecticide capability. I found this on a University of Minnesota site.

Scholarly article on DDT with footnotes called Reshaping Technology in Wartime by John H. Perkins. Archived here.

Some emails I've received from video viewers in regard to the Germans and DDT. I can't confirm the truthfullness of the information.


We read in David Hackett's introduction to The Buchenwald Report, page 10,

"On April 19 General Walter Bedell Smith relayed a report to Churchill through Lord Ismay that "the German concentration camps which have recently been overrun by the Allied armies are even indescribably more horrible than those about which General Eisenhower spoke to you yesterday."

So who is Bedell Smith? Well in my video I show a brief picture of an older CD Jackson with the writing on the photo stating "to Beadle" his nick name. He was the first director of the CIA. I think he had a wartime connection to the OSS, the predecessor the the CIA, and it's my hunch that the OSS had something to do with the holocaust myth, but frankly I can't remember where I got that impression. It was probably through the books "The Chairman" and "The Very Best Men." The OSS answered to Roosevelt and Allied Psyche Warfare answered to Eisenhower. Maybe the OSS knew that Ohrdruf wasn't a smart place to start the holocaust myth. OSS and Psyche Warfare might not have been completely coordinated regarding how to put forth the holocaust myth. And hence that snippet from Hackett's introduction of Bedell Smith trying to correct Eisenhower's move.


Finkelstein, Chomsky, Hilberg: my guess is they know the holocaust is a myth. And they might see some justification for it, regarding revenge on the Germans. Justice against the Germans. Demilitarization of Germans via guilt. But if one takes this position, then it's problematic when you see the Palestinians suffering, or when you see the Swiss banks handing over billions of dollars. And it's my opinion that that's where these guys draw the line. It explains a lot of actions on the part of these three men. They also probably take into account how, say, Chomsky coming out as a denier could discredit the Left beyond repair, and don't want that to happen. If Chomsky came out as a denier, the media could put a real spin on that. Chomsky, Finkelstein, Hilberg have all done things most consider odd. This explains why.

People drawing the line with how far they were willing to go with the ramifications of the holocaust myth didn't start with these men. It probably started with Eisenhower and his position on the 1956 Suez Crisis. This is when the UK, Israel and France colluded to invade Egypt due to Nasser's nationalizing of the Suez Canal and closing it to Israeli shipping.

In the most shocking and hard to believe modern day dissonance between the USA and the Great Britain, I'll offer a passage from Wikipedia's Suez Crisis entry. I'm not a huge Wikipedia fan by I don't have the energy to find a good solid source. Anyway, here it is:

"Part of the pressure that the United States and the rest of NATO used against Britain was financial, as President Eisenhower threatened to sell the United States reserves of the British pound and thereby precipitate a collapse of the British currency."

Evidently Eisenhower drew the line with Israel attacking Egypt.


On Polituks and commissars. Someone wrote in and mentioned that if they did execute them, they would have done it near the battlefield, not at Buchenwald. I wonder about that too. There's not a lot on the subject. There's Wolfram Sievers gruesome discussion about commissars at the Nuremberg trial, right after or before Konrad Morgen is on the stand. For a time the Nazis executed commissars. That is terrible, but the USA automatically executed certain groups also. Take 8 German spies who were dropped by a U-boat on Long Island in 1942 in Operation Pastorius. They never did anything, and were quickly caught due to one of them turning himself in, they were all initially sentenced to death. 6 out of 8 were executed by electric chair.

The alleged human skin lampshade: If you look at the base, you see an upside down "U" wide leather strip with designs on it, in the same way that belts made of leather have designs. One wonders if this is what got mistaken for tattoos, and morphed into the human skin lampshade rumor at Buchenwald.


The Dutch tour guide at Ohrdruf: Comparing what Patton said in his memoir, with a declassified letter to Eisenhower.

Patton's version in a letter to Eisenhower:

Here is the source.

"It may interest you to know that the very talkative, alleged former member of the murder camp was recognized by a Russian prisoner as a former guard. The prisoner beat his brains out with a rock."

Compare with Patton's book called War As I Knew It (pg. 293)

"Our guide claimed that he himself had received twenty-five blows with this tool. It later developed that he was not a prisoner at all, but one of the executioners. General Eisenhower must have suspected it because he asked the man very pointedly how he could be so fat. He was found dead next morning, killed by some of the inmates."

The descrepancies tell you a lot about the honesty of General Patton. Telling the story in a way to not have any questions placed on him.

Hopefully there's been something interesting here, and it doesn't read like the label of a Doctor Bronner's bottle.

 

end of 9/2/8 blog. Revised 9/18/8

9/9/8

April 12, 1945: Eisenhower, Patton, and Bradley descend into the Merkers mine to find stashed art treasures and either the entire German gold reserves or a huge part of it, but they also found gold-filled teeth?

What percentage and significance could gold-filled teeth be in comparison to a nation's gold reserves? .0001? It would be like going to Fort Knox, and in a room full of gold bricks, there also is this bag full of gold filled teeth.

It is probably one of the very first moves on the part of Psyche Warfare to get the holocaust hoax going. But whoops. The killing supposedly happened in the East. In Poland. And the American army is coming from the West. But in Psyche Warfare's initial version of the hoax (before they could be set straight) Buchenwald was a murder factory.

Later in the day, the three generals would go to Ohrdruf, which really started the holocaust myth from the Eisenhower/Psyche Warfare direction.

The gold-filled teeth surrounded by famous art works and gold bricks, is a Psyche Warfare propaganda screw-up. When extracted gold-filled teeth were later mentioned in the Buchenwald movie as they showed a crematory oven, it at least made a little more sense than gold-filled teeth stored in the same place as famous European works of art and gold bricks! Psyche Warfare was trying to get it right.

The myth came from different places. The Americans (via Psyche Warfare) are trying to start it at the Merkers mine, and later that day at Ohrdruf. But meanwhile Jewish groups and the USSR are putting forth the lie at places like Treblinka. But what a conflict! Here's why: At Treblinka they supposedly dug up 700,000 bodies and then burned them, so as to not leave a trace of evidence, but meanwhile Eisenhower, Bradley and Patton are finding a suitcase full of gold-filled teeth next to the German nation's gold reserves and art treasures. That doesn't make sense does it?

end of 9/9/8 blog. Revised 9/18/8

9-18-8

There is an interview with me here. If you don't see it, it's archived here.